https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13193
--- Comment #24 from Joonas Kylmälä <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #23) > I'm wondering if it's worthwhile effectively porting the test from > Cache::Memcached::Fast::Safe for forking: > https://metacpan.org/source/KAZEBURO/Cache-Memcached-Fast-Safe-0.06/t/ > 02_fork.t. > > It doesn't test our particular case, but, assuming it's right, should catch > cases of missed calls to disconnect_all (which ::Safe does for us here).. in > that way we should catch failures if someone down the line decides to remove > the ::Safe module without fully understanding why we were using it. > > Thoughts? or would it be enough to add a comment on top of the line +my $memcached = Cache::Memcached::Fast::Safe->new( Stating that it is a fork safe memcached module? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
