https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23292
--- Comment #8 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Andreas Hedström Mace from comment #7) > I still see Johannas approach as the more valid one, especially concerning > issues of data privacy. For Sallys use case, I would suggest changing the > approach: adding holds information to the transfer slips using the IF > statement in the TT syntax, rather than keeping todays behaviour. I agree with you, but while we think this is better, others might not. It will also create problems with updates and conflict with our principle of not interrupting workflows on update. - notices need to be changed and possibly translated - we can't automatically do that on update, so it would need a big warning sign That's why I have been asking for making this optional. We could keep the existing behaviour and switch it for new installations. Also - everyone who wants to, can switch as soon as things are configured. For you suggestion we'd also need to make sure that TRANSFERSLIP has access to the same tables/objects as the current HOLDSLIP. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
