https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7611
--- Comment #26 from Nick Clemens <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #25) > > > Manually edited: > > > Items available for loan: Centerville[Call number: 005.13/3] (1). > > > Centerville Staff Collection[Call number: 005.13/3] (2), Centerville > > > Ordered[Call number: 005.13/3] (1). Damaged (1). > > > > > What do you mean about missing 'for reference'? From my perspective that is > > a goal of the patch here - to remove that label and use the notforloan > > descriptions - if a library wants items to appear that way then they can > > make that the description of the authorized value for the opac. This way > > those who want it can put it in place, and those who don't can provide their > > own description > > But then we should also remove the "Items available for loan". > Because that is clearly giving a wrong idea? > > Just: Items: ? > > Or we can still assume that items that are marked with any 'not for loan' > value are for reference and list them with their individual status > descriptions behind the "Items available for reference" label. NVM, I got confused, yes, the conditional for 'reference' needs a fix, checking this one -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
