https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21685
--- Comment #3 from Martin Renvoize <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #2) > I'd even go so far as to ask the question of whether it's worth us starting > to take on a more consistent approach with our objects in general.. We > already actually have Moo as a dependency, we could start using some of its > recommendations today if we wanted to for type checking etc. We're also > doing a poor mans version of method signatures in a few cases now.. perhaps > we should start advocating something there too? To clarify that a bit.. I'm thinking of something along the lines of Function::Parameters + Type::Tiny -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
