https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24127
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clemens <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #6) > I understand why we removed it from the OPAC, it does not mean anything for > a regular users. But, staff-side, how could we know we are not doing to > break someone's workflow? The only scenario it works under is ES, which is a limited user set at this point so the likelihood is small. The working result is reproducible under the advanced search as well, without requiring user to know the codes for itemtypes. The search will still work via direct-query, JS can be added to restore the option if a user needs it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
