https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23243
--- Comment #7 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fisc...@bsz-bw.de> --- I can see the point of this change and agree with it, but wonder if it really makes things clearer to the end user: What is a historic expiration? (and how to translate that...) Wondering if usability wise this would be a better solution: Provide 2 date fields: Expired between (preset to today) And ____ Or maybe instead of 'history expirations' we should say: Include expirations before today. The date logic on the form is a bit hard to grasp in training in my experience. QA tools are clean now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
