https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24397
Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QA Contact|[email protected] |[email protected] |y.org | Status|Signed Off |In Discussion CC| |[email protected], | |[email protected], | |martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe | |.com --- Comment #3 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- Removing it is easy and I understand the argument. But we could discuss if the statement "koha-misc4dev must be used instead" has full consensus. How do we make sure that it is in sync and that it meets our coding guidelines etc? It is easier to grep one git repo than two? The reason for putting it outside Koha probably relates to the tedious process of getting things signed off and pushed in Koha mainstream. Somehow we do not manage as community to get that more smoothly. But I still think we should address that and not just move code somewhere else. As an alternative approach, should we copy this script (or even more) at release time into the codebase? Formulate some procedure to sync them? Any opinions? @Katrin: could you include this in the weekly QA mail? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
