http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8037
--- Comment #5 from Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> --- GetParcels does not return any itemnumbers, so we would have to add an additional check to aqorders_items. Then we could modify GetReservesFromBiblionumber to add an optional itemnumber parameter such that the count returned is only for bib-level reserves + item level reserves for that item. Should I file a separate bug for this behavior, or do you feel that it is important enough that I write a followup? (In reply to comment #4) > This is mostly working well. > > However we have one issue. > > The patch is doing this > + my ($count) = &GetReservesFromBiblionumber($line{biblionumber}); > + $line{holds} = $count; > > So if I have 3 items attached to a biblio, one of them being one I received > and can see on this screen, it will tell me I have a hold on it. > But I might have a hold on one specific item, not the one attached to this > order. > > Do we care about that? (IE this works fine for biblio level holds, false > positives for item level ones) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
