https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23681
--- Comment #59 from Andrew Isherwood <[email protected]> --- The default (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #58) > > t > > I believe so. Restrictions need a type, even if one is not explicitly > > chosen. Also, we need an ability to say "if a restriction type is deleted, > > any restrictions that use this type should fall back to type X", the default > > flag indicates which type is X. > > I do not remember I saw a way to modify it, it's hardcoded in DB (and so > could be in the code). You're absolutely right, the default must always be "MANUAL" due to the way the restrictions were originally implemented, however the name can be changed so as far as the user is concerned, it can be anything they wish. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
