https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21190
--- Comment #35 from Magnus Enger <mag...@libriotech.no> ---
Tested this, and everything looks good. To me it makes perfect sense to have
two regular sysprefs, as Marcel says, some libraries might want to log only
success or failure.
I have one question, though. After doing one failed login and some successful
ones I have this in the database:
+-----------+---------------------+------+--------+---------+--------+--------------------------+-----------+
| action_id | timestamp | user | module | action | object | info
| interface |
+-----------+---------------------+------+--------+---------+--------+--------------------------+-----------+
| 1676 | 2020-01-29 22:17:06 | 51 | AUTH | SUCCESS | 51 | Valid
password for admin | intranet |
| 1678 | 2020-01-29 22:17:17 | 0 | AUTH | FAILURE | 0 | Wrong
password for admin | intranet |
| 1680 | 2020-01-29 22:17:20 | 51 | AUTH | SUCCESS | 51 | Valid
password for admin | intranet |
| 1681 | 2020-01-29 22:18:11 | 51 | AUTH | SUCCESS | 51 | Valid
password for admin | intranet |
+-----------+---------------------+------+--------+---------+--------+--------------------------+-----------+
The successfull logins are tied to a user (51), but the failed one is not (0).
Couldn't the failed one also be tied to the user, as long as the username
provided is the username of an actual user in the db? Or is there some reason
for not doing this?
Apart from this question I'm ready to sign off.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
