https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23260
--- Comment #71 from Martin Renvoize <[email protected]> --- I see!!!! Right.. I totally missed that `but not if the item is lost, damaged, or withdrawn.` in the original request is different to how the existing anonymisation logic works. Personally (and I've checked with a few people now) I feel that the two locations this data is stored should be anonymised equally so they don't fall out of sync. As this is a change in a privacy feature I think we probably need to govern whether we filter out by item status based on a system preference to keep everyone happy. I'll add that as a followup now and update the test to correspond. Good catch Jonathan! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
