http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8587
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #7) > I have to disagree on this. I don't think hardcoding the number and just > translating the word year/years is the right way to go. I'm sure there's a > language out there where the number is after or something like that. I think it is possible to do that when you translate your po file. > I don't understand bug 8407. Maybe translation for [IF] inside options is > broken inside loops, but it's working for me in this patch. Yes, it works :) But the problem is the script xt/tt_valid.t does not accept this syntax. Then the test fails. > > 3/ Fonctionnaly what is the goal of this field? Indeed, you don't use this > > field, just store and display. > > Good question. We use it with a saved sql report here attached. Anyway I > wasn't really expecting this to be accepted. I think i'm fine leaving it > here as Failed QA and to be an option if something needs it. humm... ok :) But if this development is useful for some people it is a good idea to include it into Koha. Chris, what do you think about this development ? Do you think we want it ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
