https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24101
--- Comment #3 from Lari Taskula <[email protected]> --- Initially I was thinking of duplicating the rules of normal circulation the way maxissueqty and maxonsiteissueqty is currently done, but in the end this would lead to duplicating almost all of the circulation rules. That would not be very convenient and it seems like a short-sighted way of solving this problem because it leaves no room for possible new types of checkouts in the future. Who wants to see the circulation rule table doubling in width? Not me. Another, more elegant approach would be to define a new circulation rule scope "circulationtype" that defines whether a rule applies to normal or on-site checkout (or any other type of checkout someone may come up with in the future). Now that we are able to explicitly define a scope that a specific circulation rule follows, this would make sense. No need for ugly duplication and we can get rid of maxonsiteissueqty too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
