https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22393
--- Comment #22 from Martin Renvoize <[email protected]> --- The fallback search for deleted_items works well, but the subsequent accountline creation fails due to a foreign key relationship from accountlines.itemnumber to items.itemnumber.. as the item is now in the delete_items table the key does not exist in items. (We have an 'on delete set null' condition for said key relationship, which feels incorrect to me). > > > > > 6/ Add a manual invoice with type 'LOST' and a valid barcode, but not > > > one that will match a checkout for your user. Note an error is displayed > > > > This succeeds with no problems, and I think that is right. If a patron comes > > in, takes a book off the shelf and destroys it they may want to won up. Or a > > parent taking responsibility for a child. There are many cases you may want > > to charge a lost with no checkout > > Agreed, this should be allowed.. I think I just miswrote the plan there. I'm not so sure here.. we have internal logic for refunding lost and found items etc which rely on consistently set issue_id's.. perhaps a 'Damaged paid for' might be more helpful.. hmm. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
