https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25376
--- Comment #10 from Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Julian Maurice from comment #9) > (In reply to Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel from comment #8) > > My personal preference is a solution based on a template file, not in perl > > code. > > Can you explain why ? > Genuinely curious, as I really don't see the benefits of using a template > file here. Just a personal preference, maybe it is the option with which I feel most comfortable, after all I'm an old man and sometimes I don't like changes :) > You already said that we would have to duplicate the list to be able to use > it in both interfaces, and I think it is easier to use a Perl structure into > templates, than it is to use a "structured template file" (whatever it is) > into Perl code You are right, and something in a common namespace is preferable. How do you think a solution would be? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
