http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8600
--- Comment #4 from Maxime Pelletier <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #3) > I'll get my petty comment out of the way first: Shouldn't it be [+][-] > instead of [-][+]? I don't know why I think that. > > More importantly: I think the [-] option should only be applied to fields > which are dynamically added. If you remove a field which wasn't dynamically > added you're using the operation as a defacto "clear" button, which we offer > only in rare circumstances. > > The other problem with being able to remove a "hard-coded" row with [-] is > that it makes it possible to remove the last row which contains the [+]. If > you remove that one you don't have the option anymore to add more rows. The > final version of this enhancement should prevent/work around that problem. I disagree with the +- order because I feel like the - should be aligned. But it doesn't matter. I disagree about having the - only on dynamic lines. I do like it being some kind of clear. If I type words in 3 fields and change my mind on one I can remove it and add a new one. I have a few possible solutions and ideas and I would like your opinion on the best one to take. What I propose is to have a link "Add a new search term" at the top instead of the little [+]. That way it would always be in the same position and it would be clearer. In most app the + is to show something hidden, so a text link would help imo. Also I will change my patch to have a small red x instead of a - for the same reasons. Would that be alright with you ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
