https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25483
--- Comment #13 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fisc...@bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #12) > (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #11) > > I think the issue here is not that you don't want it to appear as link some > > cases or that it doesn't, but that we have no way to configure a link text > > (see comment#5) or shorten very long URLs. > > Which you could say, is actually a limitation of the MARC standard. Since > our 952$u comes from 852$u. MARC does not allow you to define link text here. > > The solution too provide a generic text (as in 856$u) is imo rather poor. > Especially when we add multiple URIs in one field. > > What you could do, is: add an item field urllinktext and provide a way to > enter that field in the item editor somehow. It would live in items and not > in MARC. But it could be used whenever we want to render an item URI. I think we go way beyond 852 in a lot of areas - which is also the problem: There are no more free subfields in Koha to use for this. And if you have repated $u you also get the issue of sequence. Btw - if we used MFHD (MARC for Holdings Data, we could have a full 856 there, so it's not really a limitation of the standard). The item editor is not made to resort the item subfields and I also feel like that would not be a good solution and more error prone / harder to handle for catalogers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/