https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25322
--- Comment #20 from David Roberts <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #18) > Did not we want to allow "no relationship"? I can't really think of a use case for this. Anybody acting as guarantor must have some sort of relationship with the guarantee, even if it is a non-familial relationship. Couldn't users in any case create an auth value that covers "no relationship" as an option? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
