https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22417
--- Comment #60 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #59) > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #56) > > Can we dedicate this bug report to the base idea, then create bug report on > > top of it for experiment? I'd like to avoid noise for testers and keep the > > comment list easy to follow. > > I agree with that. > > As discussed by other means, my only concerns are: > - should we make it opt-in at this stage (i.e. keep the current scripts, but > have a config/syspref that defines if the rabbitmq + daemon should be used). > As it is packaged in the supported distros/versions it is not *that* > important but worth discussing. We could, but really I don't think it's worth the effort. We will have to maintain 2 different codes that do the same thing, and will slow down for sure the move for other scripts. > - I don't agree with pulling the rabbitmq-server package automatically on a > Debian install. We don't do that with mysql-server/mariadb-server and we > should follow that approach. i.e. on the install notes, there will be an > entry, before installing koha-common, which will say 'RabbitMQ' and will > explain that if you already have one running, you point to it when calling > koha-create (bug 25674) and otherwise what command to run for installing it. Yes sure, I agree. I will implement that as soon as this is PQA. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
