http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7455
Jared Camins-Esakov <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Signoff |In Discussion --- Comment #13 from Jared Camins-Esakov <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #12) > + uses subfield '@' replacing by '00' behavior like in biblios. > + fixedfield variable was missing in subfields, in both authities and > biblios, => test it with a field < 010. Is the change to the display in the bibliographic editor intentional? Personally, I preferred the old display because it felt more consistent, and I can't see that the new display gains us anything. I'll post a screenshot in a moment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
