https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19889
--- Comment #20 from Christopher Brannon <[email protected]> --- Please the last paragraph in my comment about the criteria. I was going off the original description in this bug rather than the signed contract. This is what the contract called for: * Add a new column to the items table - 'ExcludeFromLoaclHoldsPriority' or similar * Addd the ability to mark the item from the items tab or the batch item modification page * Add a system preference 'CategoriesToExcludeFromLocalHoldsPriority' * This system preference would take a list of patron categories * Alter code to ignore local holds priority for these Talk to me about the reasoning for the placement of the patron exclusion in the patron category rather than a central preference that was outlined here. I just want to understand before you do anything. My comment about the priority for the item not showing as set still stands. That is confusing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
