https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23091
--- Comment #39 from Martin Renvoize <[email protected]> --- Sorry Andrew, looks like I didn't catch you early enough there.. I spotted a couple of nasty failure cases which I'm working through... It's turning into a bit of an unravelling thread. For the new charge, we need to fetch an old issue if any of the MarkLostItemReturned values are involved... I think that's the case that caught you.. My test environment had those all disabled for some reason.. a DB reset meant I suddenly saw your failure cases. I'll take a look at your other comments and embellish the t at plan a bit further tomorrow when I'm fresh. There's soooo many syspref interactions at play here I hadn't fully appreciated when I embarked down this path. Also, a question for you.. what should happen in the case where they have the system set to not forgive fines and to also charge a fresh fine on return of a lost item.. if feels like a mis-configuration at that point to me but should we catch that case and just fallback to doing nothing or should we niavely continue to charge a fresh fine on top so the patron would end up with two fines.. one dated up to the date when the item was marked lost and then a second dated up to the date it was marked found again? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
