https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25951

Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
                   |                            |ommunity.org
           Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected]
                   |ity.org                     |

--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> 
---
1. I would not create a separate test file
RelatedObjects.t code can be moved to a subtest of Koha/Items.t

2. On your way, you could create a Koha::Hold->library and ->patron.
->branch and ->borrower will call ->library and ->patron

branch and borrower could be marked as deprecated

3. In holds-table.inc, 
+                                    Item in transit to <strong> [%
HOLD.branch.branchname | html %]</strong> <input type="hidden" name="pickup"
value="[% HOLD.branchcode | html %]" />

It's weird to access HOLD.branch.branchname and HOLD.branchcode (better
HOLD.branch.branchcode to highlight it's the same object we access).
I think it make more sense to have a "library" variable, [% SET library =
HOLD.branch %] then reuse library for branchcode and branchname attributes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to