https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21066
--- Comment #14 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #6) > Argh... should have looked more closely at the table. I completely > understand your problem now. > > I think making the timestamp a publishingdate (better fit with > expirationdate and might be in the future) and having another real timestamp > field makes totally sense. Okay, second try. With publicationdate. Perhaps even a bit better than publishingdate ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
