https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10756
--- Comment #34 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Christopher Brannon from comment #33) > I think it would be more productive to put energy behind enhancements of > CoverFlow than to do something different. It seems like this bug is > intended to reinvent the wheel. We have used the CoverFlow plugin for > years, and it has been virtually trouble free. I understand your point. But your remark is not correct. This report was already opened before there was actually code on the CoverFlow plugin (July 2014). So talking about the "intention to reinvent the wheel" is not appropriate imo. I would not oppose closing the report anyway. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
