http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=2060

Paul Poulain <paul.poul...@biblibre.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |paul.poul...@biblibre.com

--- Comment #22 from Paul Poulain <paul.poul...@biblibre.com> ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> How can you possibly pass QA if you HAVEN'T TESTED IT!!!!
Jumping in the discution = Kyle, the QA team does not test the feature, it
investigates code to detect something not respecting coding guidelines, coding
practices.
Sometimes, the QAer also find some possible side effect. Something that is not
in the test plan, but could break another thing. In this case, there are 2
possibilities:
 * the QAer test itself
 * the QAer ask for more tests & switch back to "need signoff"
 * the QAer passes QA, warning the RM, that has the final cut anyway
(yes, that's 3 and not 2, but it's friday, so it's permitted)

;-)

Time to leave for me now, i'll test this patch lated & deeply

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to