https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23875
Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Failed QA --- Comment #15 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #12) > Are you intending on continuing here with the requested followup Nick? > > I think the suggestion was to have a fixed biblionumber index which is > numeric and use that for the tie-breaker by default.. as aposed to using the > existing 'local-number' index which can be re-mapped? I really believe we should do that and have a numerical sort on the biblionumber as a tiebreaker. I hear your argument about remapping local-number, but I believe that this is a concern that needs more work and thinking overall if we want to officially support it. At the moment, doing that, would probably break your Zebra pretty badly and now allow to switch back and forth easily anymore. Having a numerical sort on biblionumber on the tiebreaker would also mimick Zebra a bit allowing to compare relevance sort results more easily. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
