https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25624
Nick Clemens <n...@bywatersolutions.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|Needs Signoff |Signed Off
--- Comment #13 from Nick Clemens <n...@bywatersolutions.com> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #11)
> I am sorry but I don't think it's ideal.
> What will happen if we want <, <=, >, <=?
> Cannot we imagine a parameter that takes the operator?
Running this by our educators and others, they do not like the newer patch.
The borrowers table does not have numeric fields where the greater than or less
than operators are necessary.
The feeling was that offering too many operators added complexity and confusion
and would lead to more support issues rather than less.
The patches as submitted here cover the use cases requested by the library
sponsor and offer flexibility and ease of understanding for setup.
Putting this back as passed QA for consideration
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
