https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26457
--- Comment #4 from David Cook <[email protected]> --- (In reply to didier from comment #3) > It's also our analysis, there's redundant indexes on issues which may on may > not compound the problem. > PRIMARY KEY (`issue_id`), > UNIQUE KEY `itemnumber` (`itemnumber`), > KEY `issuesborridx` (`borrowernumber`), > KEY `itemnumber_idx` (`itemnumber`), > KEY `branchcode_idx` (`branchcode`), > KEY `bordate` (`borrowernumber`,`timestamp`), > > itemnumber_idx and issuesborridx are redundant. I doubt that the indexes compound the problem, but I suppose more investigation would be needed. I see that itemnumber_idx is redundant, but how is issuesborridx redundant? It's not the same as bordate. > I'll try, maybe adding a fat sleep(5) in transaction block. Certainly worth experimenting. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
