https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26581
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clemens <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #6) > (In reply to Nick Clemens from comment #5) > > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #4) > > > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #3) > > > > Shouldn't actually do the reverse and index on demand? > > > > > > *we* > > > > > > Well, it's just a thought, I haven't investigated it! > > > > Can you explain a bit more? Are you suggesting 'index_record' and don't > > index unless passed? > > Yes I am not opposed to the idea, however, it would mean redoing a lot of the code which was just done in bug 25265 and other places. I suspect it would not eliminate code, but just change the basic idea. Here we could possibly eliminate some of the storage calls, to reduce the number we have to 'skip' butlarger refactoring is needed overall so this was a start -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
