https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12556

--- Comment #63 from Martin Renvoize <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Joonas Kylmälä from comment #62)
> (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #60)
> > However, sorry Joonas, but t/db_dependent/api/v1/holds.t is failing.. and
> > ideally I'd love to see some basic tests for the new set_* methods
> > introduced in Koha::Hold.  They're trivial methods, but having a unit test
> > that proves they correctly set the three fields for each of the methods will
> > help prevent future regressions.
> 
> thanks, fixed the api test. I added the same test to set_processing and
> set_transfer methods by calling $hold->suspend_hold as there was originally
> with the set_waiting method. That should check what the function already
> does (just set the found status). Do you think it is still required to
> explicitly check the found status for these (even though it indirectly is
> checked by suspend_hold call)?

Fair point.. they are tested indirectly so they are covered.  Lets go with it
as is and we can continue to follow through further cleanups at a later date :)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to