https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23838
--- Comment #49 from Martin Renvoize <[email protected]> --- Assuming I'm reading this right, I think an minimal version 2 option would be the best route to goal.. a simple 'renewals' table with just 'issue_id' and 'timestamp' required really.. all other details can still come from the issues table directly... or are there other details we would want to record like 'type' to denote autorenewals vs manual ones, and interface to denote a staff client renewal vs an online/opac renewal?... Either way, I think we should record the minimum in the 'renewals' table and rely on the issues table link to fill out the rest of the details we may need. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
