http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8798
--- Comment #21 from Colin Campbell <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #19) > > (In reply to comment #18) > > > (In reply to comment #17) > > > > > So you're sayng they exist in the database because they were added by > > > updatedatabase but not in kohastructure.sql? > > Yes I think so. I wondered if you were generating from a pristine db. (not > > really a prob for this patch) > > > > > > > > > > > You've got an ActionLogs class but if you recreate the schema it > > > > generates > > > > an ActionLog class (Standard behaviour the Loader generates a singular > > > > named > > > > class for plural tables) shouls ActionLogs.pm be removed? > > > > > > Are you saying when you ran the generation script it gave you the singular > > > form? I see the plural form in the Results file so I'm a bit confused as > > > to > > > how that slipped through as well. > > Yes I get a ActionLog.pm which is what I would expect. Using your script or > > dbicdump. > > It was from my development DB, I'm not sure if that qualifies as pristine ;) > I wouldn't be opposed to a QAA or Paul re-running the gen script and pushing > their results. This would probably resolve both of the aforementioned > issues. The important thing in this patch is less the class files and more > the code addition in C4::Context for the schema handler. > > Let me know if you'd like me to try and regen or if there is something we > can get paul or a QAA to do. Just out of curiosity if you remove ActionLogs.pm and regenerate does it create ActionLog.pm or ActionLogs.pm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
