https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24488
--- Comment #91 from Josef Moravec <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Josef Moravec from comment #90) > This does not work correctly - in fact the behaviour is same as before patch > (only slower) > > When we get all holds at once, it will be the same as before... we need to > do one of this things: > > - get hold by biblionumber in each loop - revert last patch - bad performance > - add 'priority' => 1, to where clause - best performance, but can we > - add subquery and get only the holds with priority = min(priority) for > given biblionumber - probably the optimal solution? Sorry, commited comment too early ;) ad second point: - add 'priority' => 1, to where clause - best performance, but can we assume the lowest priority is always 1? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
