https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27078
--- Comment #2 from Christian McDonald <[email protected]> --- That makes sense, though that's conflicting with what I'm reading about scaling out memcached in this way. So then, what is the point of having multiple memcached servers (which can be configured in koha-conf.xml)? As I understand memcached (which I will admit is novice at best), the use of multiple servers is completely up to the memcached client implementation...something along the lines of hashing each keyitem against the server list, effectively tying a keyitem to a single node in the cluster. Because the number of nodes is known by all clients, this should effectively distribute keys across the nodes and ensure a cached value only lives on one node at a time. If a node goes down, those keys are simply rebased on another node. I might be completely off here too lol -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
