https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26741
--- Comment #20 from David Cook <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Victor Grousset/tuxayo from comment #19) > Failed QA (+unassigned) is because that would better indicate that this can > be eventually rescued right? Compared to in discussion. (not an expert in > statuses ^^) You're probably right. Although I keep thinking that Mason, myself, and others talked about how we're going to stay with "requires" for the time being. I can't find that conversation now though. Plus Bug 26672 provides some alternatives for people who don't want to install rabbitmq-server on the same server, although I'm not sure how functional those are in practice.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
