https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26183

Aleisha Amohia <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #3 from Aleisha Amohia <[email protected]> ---

Hey Andrew and Jonathan, just looking for some guidance here. How do you
envisage this working? We agree that many items fields should not be able to be
edited, so we thought about adding checkboxes for the fields that can be edited
such as itemlost and notforloan. But then we realised that itemlost will = 1 if
the hold item gets marked as lost anyway so including that field feels
redundant.. which only leaves notforloan. So do we change the whole syspref to
'UpdateItemNotForLoanWhenLostFromHoldList'? Or are there still other fields we
should include? And how should this look? What do you think?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to