https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22018
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Isherwood <[email protected]> --- I've been doing some more thinking about this and I'm not understanding the relevance of norenewalbefore, as mentioned by Katrin. It seems that the requirement is to allow manual renewals when autorenewals are enabled. True, norenewalbefore could prevent the user manually renewing, but so could a number of other factors, it seems like those are outside of the scope of this bug. I have also come up with an example scenario where allowing manual renewals would prevent the user incurring a huge fine (excuse the UK format dates): 28 day loan period - Current situation -------------------------------------- - Item loaned 01/01 - due 29/01 - norenewalbefore set to 7 days, so cannot renew before 22/01 - Patron going away 18/01 - 18/02 - Hold is placed on 19/01 so autorenewal on 29/01 doesn't happen - Patron incurs fines from 30/01 -> 19/02, when they return the item Following development --------------------- - Patron renews item on 17/01 just before they go away, new due date 14/02 - Hold is placed on 19/01 so autorenewal on 14/02 doesn't happen - Patron incurs fines from 15/02 -> 19/02, when they return the item Katrin, could you elaborate on why you brought up norenewalbefore? I don't want to miss some subtlety before I begin work on this :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
