https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15148
--- Comment #13 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- Rereading this I wondered: Maybe we should keep the first issue as is, but rename it "Start issue" or similar and have a new and different field, perhaps linked to subscription history, for the first issue published/available in the library if there is a need for having this information? My use case was this: The subscription start date could have been at the beginning of the year or even years ago (most here are renewed automatically) and I don't really care about this date for the predictions. The "Start issue" would be the one I start predicting with. The "historical" first issue would be the first one in my library's collection. ... and now I wonder if this isn't what the subscription history fields are already supposed to be used for: - Check manual history - Go to the subscription - Edit the manual history - Change the subscription start date. It won't change the start date when editing the subscription, as these fields are all stored separately in the database. So maybe the solution is ultimately to make the history more accessible and maybe add any additionally needed information there? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
