https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26181
--- Comment #9 from Martin Renvoize <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #3) > I left the AllowHoldPolicyOverride name in the x-koha-override header on > purpose. To have less friction on this patches. > But I really preferred something like 'holds-policy'. Food for thought. I'm tempted by the actual rule/policy failure names being in x-koha-override.. and in this case as the override is only available as a 'all or nothing' we should start with a special 'any' rule. So x-koha-override: [ any ] # Meaning, override whatever we failed for in the future x-koha-override: [ any, damaged_item, transfer_restriction, age_restriction, etc, etc ] # An override per policy violation error that can be thrown and individually override. Thoughts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
