https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27661
Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|In Discussion |Signed Off --- Comment #15 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #14) > (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #13) > > We are advertizing here that we support SQL polling and Rabbit MQ. > > Is that really the way we want to go? Support both ways for any new case > > where we would like to use RabbitMQ? > > The SQL polling has been added to the initial use of RabbitMQ as a fallback > > and probably for building some confidence. > > > > Since I doubt that we will be supporting both ways, I would propose > > rewording. > > Any thoughts? > > See misc/background_jobs_worker.pl lines 58-63, there is no additional code, > and it applies to all jobs. It shouldn't hurt to have it and keep it. Thx for clarifying. Had the impression that it was written for a specific job. Which is not the case. Revisiting. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
