https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27344
--- Comment #15 from Martin Renvoize <[email protected]> --- Hmm, I'm not contemplating whether we should actually be de-coupling 'jobs' from 'queues'.. or letting the 'type' option take a negation. Right now we just have the two jobs (three when this patch is added).. but if we see it getting real adoption we could end up with lots of different jobs.. it would become tedious listing all but one.. as such we might either want to say !update_elastic_index for one worker whilst update_elastic_index for another.. rather than having to list all remaining jobs on your non elastic worker. Other queuing systems appear to use 'queues' as a second distinction instead.. so we could have a 'default' queue that the non-elastic indexing tasks go onto and another for the elastic one.. that way we can differentiate into groups rather than having to list all types.. Thoughts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
