https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25078
Julian Maurice <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #24 from Julian Maurice <[email protected]> --- I suggest to go even further by removing the tie between Koha version and database updates. It is not needed that each database update increments the Koha version (and it gives RM/RMaints additional work that could be avoided). I wrote something with that idea in mind: https://gitlab.com/jajm/Koha/-/commits/migrations - https://gitlab.com/jajm/Koha/-/commit/58bb8addbd4bb8deedd4643b8c465d8ac1857d8f Basically it's like atomicupdate, but the filename is prefixed by a timestamp to keep the updates ordered and the filename is saved in a table once successfully executed (so that updates are not executed twice). No need to replace XXX by the correct version, and it should be backport-friendly (but only once this get pushed into stable releases... can't win everywhere :/) This makes the 'Version' system preference useless, so a lot of the patch is for removing usage of it. I realize that it's out of the scope of the current bug, but since other patches tend to go that way (splitting DB updates), I think that having another alternative is good for discussion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
