https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27842
--- Comment #13 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- I wonder if we are on the right track here by changing the information in past serials or if this doesn't destroy useful information. Serials are known to be odd. When you look at the national serials database they have a graph view on their record detail pages where you can see how often they change their names, merge with others... divide etc. It's pretty, but also scary! And for our catalogers every change like this means a new record. So it makes sense that we can change which record a subscription is attached to. The name change would not necessarily affect the subscription itself. So could it be by design that the original biblionumber was stored? As you said, we don't actually need it, as we have the current biblionumber in the subscription. If it was thought to be for keeping some history, it could make sense and the fix would maybe to stop it from deleting the issues when the record is deleted. We could also think about updating the biblionumber of the next expected issue when the biblionumber is changed. Not sure about this - just something I was wondering about when I noticed the biblionumber in serials in the past. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
