https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26459
Victor Grousset/tuxayo <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Victor Grousset/tuxayo <[email protected]> --- It works and QA tools are happy :) 1. It seems these two lines of code do the same thing: default to + if not - passed hold_mode => $hold_mode eq '-' ? '-' : '+', my $hold_mode = $params->{hold_mode} || '+'; 2. IIUC we are using a separated flag as opposed to having something like "-m hold+"/"-m hold" and "-m hold-" (not sure if that would be more clear to use) because that reflects better the underlying SIP protocol. (direct mapping to the flag) A bit verbose the separate flag but that should make sense. 3. Accepts +: Add hold or -: Cancel hold, defaults to + Is ↓that↓ more clear? Accepts "+" to add hold or "-" to cancel hold, defaults to + 4. Not really related thing, shouldn't the following place an item level hold? sip_cli_emulator.pl -a localhost -p 6001 -su term1 -sp term1 --patron 23529001000463 --item 39999000000511 -m hold -l CPL It places a record level one. (which can be piled up and bypasses Holds per record circ rule) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
