https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28013
--- Comment #14 from Joonas Kylmälä <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Nick Clemens from comment #13) > (In reply to Joonas Kylmälä from comment #12) > > Nick, is it possible to drop the dependency to bug 28078? I mean if we don't > > take it would the behaviour change with your refactoring here or stay same? > > Please see my comments in bug 28078, it is probably not the right solution > > there so if we can drop that as dependency to this it would be great as the > > discussion over there wouldn't block this. > > If we only keep the last patch here and drop the correction of the call to > CanItemBeReserved and the units tests we can. > > They can be filed as separate bugs if you think that is best I think it is for the best. Isn't the bug already reported in: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26659 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
