https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28057
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clemens <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #3) > Sorry, but can you explain a bit more? > We have both biblioitemnumber and biblionumber on items table. biblioitems > doesn't have any functionality at the moment, apart from it's 1:1 to biblio. > So why do we need to preserve the use of biblioitemnumber? We don't necessarily have to use biblioitem - but we do need to loop through multiple biblios in the case where we are dealing with analytics/host items This bug is intended to simply fix the bug/confusion here, rather than refactor the whole script My explanation was just to aid anyone looking, and to explain why I change the comment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
