https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23207
--- Comment #29 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #28) > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #27) > > 1. Entry missing in misc/cronjobs/crontab.example > > Good catch. > > > 2. Any good reasons to not add the info in a new column of the itemtypes > > table? > > You mean is missing the COMMENT? Not sure if it#s there already, but I think waht's meant was administration > itemtypes - showing the setting there in column, so you can filter etc. > > > 3. (just grumbling) we really need to remove the item type at biblio level > > (item-level_itypes syspref) and have a FK on items.itemtype. Not having the > > ability to join here is terrible, we have to loop over all the checkouts... > > Not considering blocker but we may want to improve perf here in the future > > using the usual (ugly) condition for the join. > > This is a broader discussion, but biblio-level itype is really a thing, > because it is used for filtering and facets as well. I agree, we cannot remove the itemtype on biblio-level, it's tied to varioud features and checks (max reserves check for biblio level holds, article requests without items etc.) We could maybe remove it from MARC/only add it for indexing maybe? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
