https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25029
--- Comment #14 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Caroline Cyr La Rose from comment #13) > For me, AllowPatronToControlAutorenewal is a switch to add this option to > the OPAC, not to enable/disable the whole feature. Which is why I thought > another syspref would be the way to go. > > But that's just the way I understand it, it may be wrong. > > I honestly don't care much how it is implemented, I would have been happy > with the BorrowerUnwantedFields method. But since we started upgrading > clients to 20.05, I've had multiple comments on the yes/no option in the > patron file. So I thought I'd comment with my thoughts and experience. I totally agree with you on the master switch, that would be nice to remove complexity from the GUI for libraries not interested in automatic renewals at all. I can also imagine a disable setting for AllowPatronToControlAutoRenewal, as not everyone will probably want this type of granular per person setting. BUT BIG BUT: I don't think it should hide it from circulation rules, but only control the option in he patron record. Having auto-renewals scheduled automatically and the options to intervene for some patrons are different things. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
