https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14239
--- Comment #6 from David Cook <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Henry Bolshaw from comment #5) > It sounds like BIBFRAME might be making some slow progress again: > > "The Library of Congress is planning for 2021 to be an expansion year for > its BIBFRAME cataloging operation as a large project involves bringing all > the cataloging staff into BIBFRAME. This means that interchange using both > BIBFRAME and MARC will also expand, as will the potential for new > developments for systems based on either format. This Update will hear about > plans of Ex Libris for Linked Data -- How bridging the BIBFRAME and MARC > workflows might work in the Folio development -- And an OCLC intent to be > able to “adroitly” consume and export BIBFRAME data." > > > https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/news/bibframe-update-mw2021.html Thanks for that, Henry. That's interesting to know! For what it's worth, I don't think we need to worry about a triplestore/graph store for a long time. I think we could already store BIBFRAME records in the biblio_metadata table. I suppose the hardest thing would be deciding whether a particular biblio uses BIBFRAME or MARC as its primary record, and then making sure there was an appropriate transformation at indexing time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
